The federal tax code definiton of antique is used for the purpose of the US 
government tax code for use of taxes only. If you reach out into the antique 
community and speak to the experts, including authors, antique dealers, who 
deal with the period antiques, antiques are considered by the trade items that 
are much older than 100 years old, again the time period of 1840 as cited in my 
explanation below. I am not trying to diminish the the true nature of our 
hobby, but items and products made after 1840, again according to the trade, 
are considered collectibles. The government is stretching  the term "antiques" 
for the purposes of taxes which for the dealer can be used to their advantage. 

-----Original Message-----
From: John Maeder <[email protected]>
To: Antique Phonograph List <[email protected]>
Sent: Fri, Jan 8, 2010 5:30 am
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] definition of "antique"



er, 
In my previous post on this subject I said that I had long-ago heard that the 
00-year old rule of defining an 'antique' came from Federal tax code, and I 
hink it probably comes from the importation rule to which you refer.  As I also 
aid in that post, dealers used to assiduously avoid calling an item an 
antique' unless it was demonstrably 100 years old.  I don't know how many 
eople on the board were into antiques 43 years ago, but I can assure you that 
ack then, that was the way it was done.  And ger, you are correct, phonographs 
ere largely considered junk by the vast majority of dealers because they simply 
eren't old enough to be considered antique, and besides that, they were 
lentiful back then.  I never used to look for phonos in the front rooms of 
ntique shops -- I'd head straight to the back 'junk' rooms and there they'd be!
re: pet peeves -- It bugs me when an eBay or Craigslist listing refers to a 
honograph (or anything) as a "unit".  "This unit works great."  Also, "ones" . 
 . "This is one of the nicest ones I have ever seen" ("It doesn't look like the 
umeral one, it looks like a Victor VI to me," I'm thinking! Redundant, as 
ell).  And "guts", as in ". . . cabinet only, the guts have been removed".  Are 
hose really the best words they can come up with?  "Specific is terrific," my 
hird-grade teacher, Mes. Norlund, used to say when teaching us how to write.
It took me a moment to figure out what "EAPG" meant right out of the barrel 
like 
hat, but, the context and recalling what you had previously posted allowed me 
o figure it out pretty quickly.  Mrs. Norlund also used to tell us, "Write like 
he reader doesn't know anything about what you are writing about."  BTW, it is 
pelled 'Sumerian', not "Sumarian".  LOL!  Sorry, just had to kid you a little 
here!
> From: [email protected]
 To: [email protected]
 Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 02:05:14 -0500
 Subject: Re: [Phono-L] definition of "antique"
 
 For purposes of importation, the govt defined an "antique" as anything older 
han 100 years (an "antiquity" is much older, as in hundreds or thousands of 
ears...Sumarian, ex.). This 100 years has been accepted for many moons as the 
efinition of antique (everywhere except ebay, of course). I checked this 
efinition on an official gov site at least 15 years ago. Obviously this 
nvolves a moving date of production. And I think that the 100-year mark is 
ignificant, because...
 
 Interest appears to take off when an invention/item is near its 100th 
nniversary.
 
 I noticed that EAPG (my main collectible) began to get popular 1930-ish, 
ecause EAPG was near the 100 year mark (first glass pressed in 1825), and 
eople became more aware.
 
 Didn't the phonograph also take off on some type of "anniversary" of its 
reation?? How many of the collectors here became more earnest in the 1980's or 
990's when the phono was commercially about 100 years old? 
 
 Since ebay's appearance, someone added the definition of "semi-antique" as 
nything being 50 years old...not exactly sure where that one came 
rom...possibly the govt as well. Hmmmm I think we might have a few semi-antique 
ollectors here. ;)
 
 Also, one of my pet peeves: using the word "vintage" to mean something really 
old." Vintage has to have a year or some reference to a time period added to 
t, as in "vintage 1893," or "Depression vintage," or even "vintage 1993."
 Just my 2 cents worth. ;)
 
 Ger
 PS: In my experience, particularly online watching chat groups, our younguns 
in't so hot on grammar OR spelling. It used to drive me nuts. But now "your" 
eing used for "you're" is becoming common, even in ads on tv! Who's to 
lame...or should I use a youngun's "whose" since they don't seem to know the 
ifference between those 2 words either. LOL
 
 ----- Original Message ----- 
   From: [email protected] 
   To: [email protected] 
   Sent: Sunday, January 03, 2010 7:17 PM
   Subject: Re: [Phono-L] definition of "antique" - was Re: Shipping 
honographs
 
 
   Anyhting made after 1840 is not an antique, but is considered a collectible. 
nything antique is usually referred to as an item hand made prior to 1840. A 
east for furniture this date is of signifigance due to the creation of the wire 
ail. Nails were hand wrought 1840 and prior. Also wood was being cut after 1840 
ith a circular saw and no longer by hand. So cars and phonographs are more or 
ess collectibles rather than antiques. 
 
 
 
   -----Original Message-----
   From: Robert Wright <[email protected]>
   To: Phono L <[email protected]>
   Sent: Sun, Jan 3, 2010 3:59 pm
   Subject: Re: [Phono-L] definition of "antique" - was Re: Shipping 
honographs
 
 
 
   ntique is a moving target, and I think it always has been.  Regarding its 
egal 
   efinition for purposes of insurance claims against shipping damage, Rich is 
   ight, it does need to be clearly stated, though I think 100 years is too 
any, 
   ersonally.  I've also found more than one source saying 100 years is the 
   ypical consideration (none of which were wiki-related).  
   Seems it's a bit like "unique", another word murdered by popular usage and 
   eneral misunderstanding.  There are no degrees of unique -- it means 
iterally 
   ne of its kind in all of existence.  That one gets me worse than "antique" 
   oes.
   Fun story, Peter.  I know people less than half your friend's age who are 
till 
   o scared to embrace modern (computer) technology fully, even though in their 
>   outh they were anything but Luddite.
 
 
 _______________________________________________
 Phono-L mailing list
 http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
                     
______________________________________________
hono-L mailing list
ttp://phono-l.oldcrank.org

_______________________________________________
Phono-L mailing list
http://phono-l.oldcrank.org

Reply via email to