Jim wrote:
> Zak Greant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > :) I should have chosen the symbols more carefully. 
> > They seem to have generated more comments than the original proposal...
> > 
> > Does anyone have any comments pertaining to the *concept*? :)
> i was trying to drive at the point that you've just restated a
> slightly weaker form of the apache project guidelines.

    Not quite. I was just describing a tool to help in browsing
    the accumulated opinions.

> (now, a tool to make it easier to implement those guidelines may be a
> good idea. but i see that as distinct from the process itself. and i
> think anything that moves discussion out of email is doomed to fail.)

    Possibly... given how many discussions fail (or are doomed to some
    sort of unlife - like the function renaming discussion) I don't
    see how it could hurt to try. :)
> the real problem is determining who gets to vote.

    I am not even worried about votes, etc. I just want a way to more
    easily keep track of what is going on. :)

    The rating were just there to provide a quick way to track general


PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to