Hi Alex, > LPGL does not help very much, as I see it, because "linking" is not > typical usage.
as I mentioned earlier, people involved in Lisp development already thought about it and invented LLGPL that defines LGPL for use in Lisp context which is rather different from C linking etc. That might be something to look at. Other popular licence used with Common Lisp seems to be a BSD style and MIT licence. Although comp.lang.lisp is rather unfriendly to anything not Common Lisp, maybe the people there could provide some hints on choosing a suitable licence? Cheers, Tomas -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
