Hi Alex, > For me it is critical, as my economic survival depends on it.
Do you mean that your economic survival depends on changing the licence to BSD? Then yes, because without you there is no PicoLisp;-) > What do you think if PicoLisp were released under the BSD license > instead of GPL? http://www.linfo.org/linus.html In what Torvalds now admits was one of his best decisions, he decided to release Linux under the GPL (GNU General Public License)... Although I wouldn't mind a BSD style licence. It's mostly your sweat you're giving away;-) There are also other licences like Lisp Lesser General Public Licence http://www.cliki.net/LLGPL http://opensource.franz.com/preamble.html which is used in some Common Lisp projects and it does address some concerns specific to Lisp development. I'm not a lawyer so I can't advice on licensing issues. Cheers, Tomas -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picol...@software-lab.de?subject=unsubscribe