Dear Alex, > determining the size, by loading slightly modified sources into standard > miniPicoLisp. The target system would have had dedicated hardware to > interface with, but the project didn't get of the ground (yet?).
OK. I understand. It will be really nice to port the lib/http.l codebase for Alcor6L since we have a uIP stack on the microcontroller for ethernet Apps. I'm sure I'll have many questions when I get to it (a sock library for PicoLisp on Mizar32 :) Although the uIP interface is a bit buggy, it still works. One can still use PicoLisp over a telnet session. R On 22 September 2014 12:02, Alexander Burger <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear Raman, > > > > FYI: I did some experiments for a minimal web server (loading the full > > > miniPicoLisp 'pil' environment plus "lib/http.l", "lib/xhtml.l" and > > > "lib/form.l"). It occupied about 500 kB. This was OK because we had a > > > limit of 1 MB. > > > > Wow! Fantastic! > > > > But just a question. Since miniPicoLisp doesn't come with support for > > sock or other system specific functions, how did you manage to get > > "lib/http.l" to work with it? Am I missing something? > > Sorry, I didn't fully explain. These experiments were only about > determining the size, by loading slightly modified sources into standard > miniPicoLisp. The target system would have had dedicated hardware to > interface with, but the project didn't get of the ground (yet?). > > ♪♫ Alex > -- > UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe >
