On 13/08/10 13:45, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:01:43PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> On 13/08/10 08:01, Andreas Tille wrote: >>> BTW, I have another issue: This mailing list recieves a lot of >>> packaging related information which I#m not really interested in. >>> However, de just have this mailinglist debian-multime...@l.d.o. Do >>> you see a chance that we move discussion like this about general >>> project management, Blends stuff, user oriented questions to this >>> mailing list. I was asked to raise the Blends issue here on this >>> list and so did I, but I would prefer if I would not be spammed by >>> bug reports of multimedia packages which I'm simply not interested >>> in. In other projects such split between user oriented list @l.d.o >>> and a maintainer list @a.l.d.o has turned out as quite reasonable. >>> >> >> Well, this was discussed at the time of the merge between the two >> teams. Basically, we decided to have everything on the alioth list >> because we feared the traffic was so small we would dilute the >> interest. Perhaps the time has come to rethink this? > > As I see it we now do not discuss opening up another communication > channel but (re)using an old "brand" when marketing (some or all of) > what we produce.
At the time we decided to use pkg-multimedia-maintainers instead of debian-multimedia because it avoids the name clash with Marillat's repository. (Just another datapoint to consider). -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers