Re: [Plf-discuss] are win32 codecs still useful ?

Mon, 30 Oct 2006 05:55:48 -0800 

On 10/30/06, Vincent Panel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/30/06, michel memeteau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > If not, wouldn't it be the moment to remove this problematic package ?
> >
> > Why is it so problematic ? because it's binary and proprietary ? like many
> > others ...
> >
> Yes, all PLF non-free packages are problematic. The more there is, the
> more free is the world.
>
I meant 'The less there is", of course...
_______________________________________________
PLF-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.zarb.org/mailman/listinfo/plf-discuss

Reply via email to