On Tuesday 31 October 2006 05:46, Michael Scherer wrote: > > I'll echo other people and ask what exactly makes > > win32-codecs more problematic than, say, the Nvidia driver > > or the Flash plugin. > > Just compare the license of nvidia to the lack of license of > those codecs.
Thank you, that's all I was asking for. I agree that some of these codecs are probably what you would call "warez". Maybe a fake RPM like we used to use for msttcorefonts (where it would retrieve the software off of some web site somewhere, instead of including them in the RPM itself) would be a safer option? Rob _______________________________________________ PLF-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://www.zarb.org/mailman/listinfo/plf-discuss
