Hi Alan,
I'm just testing the ada bindings with MinGW but there are some
problems. So far I solved the following ones:
1) gnat library is not found - we need to set CMAKE_LIBRARY_PATH:
rem setup ada
set
CMAKE_LIBRARY_PATH=%MINGWDIR%\lib\gcc\mingw32\3.4.5\adalib;%CMAKE_LIBRARY_PATH%
where MINGWDIR is the path to the MinGW installation.
2) gnatgcc doesn't exist - in Windows this is gcc! In
"CMakeDetermineAdaCompiler.cmake" change line 33 to
SET(CMAKE_Ada_COMPILER_LIST gnatgcc gcc)
though I don't think that that is the correct way to do it - don't know
if Linux/Mac OSX gcc knows how to handle ada files. Don't know why
Windows gcc knows it.
Than cmake configures happily, but we encounter problems while compiling:
[ 45%] Building Ada object bindings/ada/CMakeFiles/plplotadad.dir/plplot.obj
C:\DevZone\MinGW-3.4.5\bin\gcc.exe -Dplplotadad_EXPORTS
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -o bindings/ada/CMakeFiles/plplotadad.dir/plplot.obj -c
Z:\DevZone\PLdev\plplot\bindings\ada\plplot.adb
gnat1: incorrect object file extension
Argh, gnat1 wants to have .o as ending instead of .obj though the latter
one is Windows style. If I run the last command and change plplot.obj to
plplot.o it compiles! I need to copy it to obj, than cmake accepts it
and continues but than the same with the thin library. Change command to
.o by hand, compile, copy it. Than library builds. First example, same
problem. Change, compile, copy. But than:
gnatmake: "x01a.exe.adb" not found
so the extension is a problem.
Ok, this gets now a little tedious - I actually don't know how to fix
the .obj/.o problem. This is set by cmake, but mingw-gnat obviously is
buggy here.
And than it seems the .exe is in <TARGET>, which you use, Alan, instead
of <SOURCE> or so, if I followed your posts to the CMake List correctly.
So, any help would be appreciated.
- Werner
Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> On 2007-03-01 09:40-0800 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>
>> On 2007-02-28 19:34-0700 Jerry wrote:
>>
>>> So--I recommend just renaming all the example files to x??a.adb and
>>> letting them run as standalones, and eliminating the x??.adb and
>>> x??.ads naming level completely. That was my intention originally but
>>> I see that I forgot to adopt that naming convention. I can take care
>>> of this.
>> Hi Jerry:
>>
--
Dipl. Ing. Werner Smekal
Institut fuer Allgemeine Physik
Technische Universitaet Wien
Wiedner Hauptstr 8-10
A-1040 Wien
Austria
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: http://www.iap.tuwien.ac.at/~smekal
phone: +43-(0)1-58801-13463 (office)
+43-(0)1-58801-13469 (laboratory)
fax: +43-(0)1-58801-13499
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Plplot-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plplot-devel
