> STFW returns, for example: > > http://dmoz.org/Computers/Internet/Etiquette/Email/
I checked out the first four citations: http://songweaver.com/netiquette.html http://www.dynamoo.com/technical/etiquette.htm http://www.cs.queensu.ca/FAQs/email/etiquette.html http://www.iwillfollow.com/email.htm None of them mention the problem that replying to a message and changing the subject screws up the thread (the sin that I was chastised for). None of them specifically mentions top quoting versus bottom quoting (although the examples shown in some of them all have top quotes with bottom replies). Having been told, I will create new messages rather than reply with a change of subject but don't assume your rules are widely known or widely disseminated. __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More http://faith.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ plucker-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-list
