2 years ago, I started using OO to test how a Linux desktop user would feel 
trying to port all of his work to Linux . I wasn't running Linux per se but OO 
on a office desktop and pure Linux in another laptop (at home). The challenge I 
met was that there are lots of features that OO do not support yet but M$ 
office does. But it was cool enough for word processing, simple presentation 
and basic spreadsheet function. Sadly, I stopped using OO late last year since 
it was very tedious to start the doc in OO then complete the stuff on M$ due to 
lack of features. Otherwise, I have a strong feeling where to position OO in 
the desktop environment.

After OO, I became an active user of FreeMind - I replaced MindManager which 
costs more than $200 a pop for a basic version. One of my guys in the office 
also use Ubuntu in a laptop for project management and server administration - 
it does the job so far. 

In fairness, Linux desktop functionalities have gone a long way since Red Hat 
v7.1 workstation (where I started). Stories about corporations are taking it in 
as their desktops are not surprising; but it's not for everyone. At least, not 
yet...

----- Original Message ----- 
  From: AC Perdon 
  To: Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Technical Discussion List 
  Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2008 8:13 AM
  Subject: Re: [plug] linux on the corporate desktop


  Hi,

  Healthways clinic use linux as desktop nurse  station even my doctor uses it. 
the desktop they use is gnome.

  -AC


  On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 5:49 PM, Marvin Pascual <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

    Cool!  B-)


    On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 11:16 AM, John Peter Loh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

    > About two years ago, I saw a Pentium 4 server providing LTSP to about
    > 80 computers (mixture of 386 to Pentium MMXs) at a manufacturing
    > plant. They used OOo (not sure what version) and Thunderbird
    > primarily. Another server acted as a gateway, proxy (their ISP is
    > SMART Bro) and mail server.
    >
    > If I remember it right, I was told that they've been using the same
    > configuration since 2002. The guy that configured the servers left the
    > country when we took a peek (and he's probably a member of PLUG, too).
    >
    > They were very happy with the configuration being low maintenance and
    > all. They only had 1 IT personnel. He attended a seminar on Linux then
    > from there he fixed daily problems with the LTSP server being
    > overloaded. It was then that they sought for help to upgrade the
    > servers since they are about to expand.
    >
    > Only two computers had Windows installed for opening MS Office
    > documents that won't open properly on OOo.
    >
    > Pretty close to corporate use but that's one case that I'm proud of.
    > There are a lot of small offices that also moved to Linux. The largest
    > that I know of has more than 300 computers with Ubuntu.
    >
    > Q1: I think it's very ready for corporate desktop.
    > Q2: When one client of ours saw how Linux worked fine in an office and
    > how much was paid for the license, he said, "Bill better send me a
    > card this Christmas." I think it's the cost.
    > Q3: Lots and lots of preparation for training (user and support)
    >
    > Regards,
    > JP

    _________________________________________________
    Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
    http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug
    Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph




  -- 
  AC Perdon
  Registered GNU/Linux User #340122 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _________________________________________________
  Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
  http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug
  Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
_________________________________________________
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug
Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph

Reply via email to