> I guess I am saying that I want both RAW converters at the same time. Give > me the fine adjustments of hue/colour, sharpness and lens corrections of the > CS RAW and then the GUI and batch power of C1 Pro and it would be the > perfect RAW converter. What do you think?
Hi I'm finding that using the amount of sharpening you suggest in CS raw is generating too many artefacts. I've found that leaving more of the sharpening until the end is getting me the best results (landscapes) especially with bigger (25"x17") prints. The batch facilities are very good in C1, but I take raw and jpeg at the same time and use the jpegs for weeding out the frames worthy of individual conversion. The lighting and exposure often varies quite a bit, so batch processing would not really help much with this area of my work. Where I have used a batch conversion (such as correcting some particularly weird lighting in a sports hall) the CS actions were up to the job. I know some people consider the conversion ability of C1 vastly superior, but maybe they shoot differently from me and have somewhat different perceptual faculties :-) :-) I suppose when it comes down to it, any advantages offered by C1 are -to me- currently not worth the extra dosh, which is also enough to prevent more extended experimentation. bye for now Keith Cooper PS Thanks to all those who sent messages of sympathy after I nearly lost my house in the fire -- I know of several people have also now instigated a more thorough off-site backup policy ;-) =============================================================== GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
