Thomas Holm / Pixl > Duncan McNeill wrote: > >> I wondered if anyone has experience of >> *Incamera*<http://www.typemaker.co.uk/products/incamera.html>. This >> would seem to automate Bruce Frazers method, and remove the pain - or >> am I hoping for too much?
> Thomas Holm wrote > > If you build custom profiles of any kind, you have to work with something > else than camera raw. Unless you build a profile on top of the data > extracted from camera raw... > > Either you use profiles, OR you use camera Raw... I don't understand, Incamera tells you to use raw data without a profile, it suggests that you shouldn't try to profile data that has already has a profile. The instructions seem reasonably easy to follow, but it doesn't seem to work too well; though I have assumed I must be doing something dramatically wrong. I cannot get anything that looks remotely correct ( exaggerated solarization), so I assume it must be operator error. If it would work, it would be a quite elegant solution, to have a plug within CS is certainly easier for me ( rather than creating a profile with Colorblind matchbox - which is also a bit hit and miss). matt barlow =============================================================== GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
