I'm not knocking OO, I am challenging the ease of implementation that people
assume is there because you know Office.
Well, there's different types of "Office", just as there are different
types of "FoxPro" users.
If you're using Fox as an interactive database tool (like so many people
in the 80s and mid-90s did), moving to <whatever> isn't that big a deal.
There are rows and columns and filters and printing reports.
But if you're using FoxPro as a programming language, then, yes,
absolutely, moving to <whatever> is a big, hairy deal.
Problem is, here, that "office user" isn't a one-size-fits-all
description. :)
Of course, neither is "FoxPro programmer" (remember my thread on 10
stupid developer tricks this spring?), but that's a DIFFERENT thread.
Har-har.....
Whil
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
