You are confusing limitations with functionality. Virgil's point, which I agree with whole-heartedly, is that if it can't be done on paper then it can't be done. No mention of efficiently. So, the paper system has serious limitations due to the physical constraints such as quantity or response times - that's why we use computers! But the basics still apply, if it can't be done on paper first then it can't be done.
John Weller Wessex Computer Solutions 01380 728880 07976 393631 > Hi Virgil! > > I am using paper now. I am desperate to get it automated. Just can't do a > large enough universe for the stats to mean anything on paper. > > Regards, > > Pete > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Pete Theisen > Sent: 16 October 2006 04:05 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [JOB] VFP to .NET update > > > > > Like I said, if you can't do it via paper first, then you can't > define it, > > and if you can't define it, you can' t develop it... > > > > There's not a single application out there that can't be defined via > > antiquated paper... > _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
