> > I question the "worked extremely well for others" part, and I'll offer > > the OT stats as evidence in this case. > > The stats mean nothing to me, since the numbers that I > see in my email client are completely different. Who cares if some > idiot posts a million messages if none of them make them to my inbox?
Then I'll offer "the condition of OT as evidence". You may well be capable of ignoring the flood of garbage that comes across that wire, but I don't think everyone else has the same faculty. I know I don't. I understand the history, that you started ProFox because we all rebelled against the thought police and that you are a relentless advocate of free speech. I cannot disagree with you on that, but what none of us have come up with is a solution to what happens when free speech is abused. I know, I can't even define "abused", but what I can do is look around and realize that something has gone very wrong, and not just with ProFox OT, but on a much larger scale as well. Bill > -- Ed _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
