Allen wrote: > ok I'll bite > What has thunderbird got that outlook hasnt. Email wise that is > Im not likely to change unless thunderbird got all the calendar goodies and > worked with activesync. And didnt lock up when it checked emails like > outlook does (2003). > Allen > I moved from Outlook to TB 2 or 3 years ago. And despite liking the look and feel of OL2007 I'm still sticking with TB.
What I like: - doesn't lock up or leave several copies running hidden like OL does. - it's free - I've not yet been unable to read a data file in TB - which happened to me a couple of times with OL That's it really. I don't use/need all the calendar and activesync stuff ... -- Cheers ============ Brian Abbott ============ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
