But if I rename the schematic sheets, I also have to update all links to that sheet from higher levels in my hierarchy. Yuk! I just let the ddb filename carry the version number, so it's always clear from the window title which one I'm looking at. (Each ddb also includes a 'change log' where I keep brief notes of changes as I make them; and each version will be in it's own (OS) folder along with other relevant files.)
> -----Original Message----- > From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 2:05 PM > > At 08:19 PM 11/13/01 +0000, Steve Wiseman wrote: > >....... or I'll be working on a new revision of > >an older design, while referencing the previsou iteration - in both cases, > >the sheet names will clash, and the bug will happen. Changing all subsheet > >names to reflect the version number would be a pain, and I'm not keen. > > Understandable but bad practice. There is room for plenty of characters in > a schematic name and they should properly include revision level. To do > otherwise is to invite trouble, in my opinion. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To leave this list visit: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html * * Contact the list manager: * mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * Forum Guidelines Rules: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html * * Browse or Search previous postings: * http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
