Ian has collected some things here, http://www.considered.com.au/DXP_vs_P99SE.htm
John > -----Original Message----- > From: Stephen Noftall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, June 25, 2004 11:27 PM > To: Protel EDA Forum > Subject: Re: [PEDA] Spice Simulation (V & I) Probes on Schematic? > > John A. Ross [RSDTV] wrote: > > The resistance to change to the DXP platform, regardless of their > > motives, has been extremely poor compared to previous > versions. One of > > our policies for accepting external work is that the client should > > supply the toolset of there choice to use and they must > maintain it with the latest versions (support etc) and the > resistance to change has been very noticable. > > Hello all; First post on the forum for me! > > I understand how you feel John. I have been a Protel/Orcad user since > DOS3.1 days. Sometimes, I wish I was still back there ;-) > > There are times when waiting for the 15 Seconds DXP takes to > fire up on my rig that I wish Protel had just concentrated on > what I wanted. I still think the original Orcad was a better > schematic entry tool than what I use now. > > But for my question: I have just received Protel PCB 2004. > Now, everytime I ask Altium why would I want to upgrade from > DXP (SP2) to PCB 2004, I get a cryptic answer (It's our > latest software!). Can anyone explain the difference between > the two? From all I can gather, they are exactly the same. > But what real-world difference is there? > > Thanks! > > Stephen Noftall > > > * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To leave this list visit: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html * * Contact the list manager: * mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * Forum Guidelines Rules: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html * * Browse or Search previous postings: * http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
