On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 05:06:09PM +0100, Romain François wrote:
> > I'm using method name encoded in query part of URL like
> > /base/url?Service.Method
>
> That seems odd. Why not /base/url?service=Service&method=Method instead ?
For simplicity (from my point of view). Query string is here only to identify
method
to call and not to pass parameters to it. So why to bother?
> > Also it's seem useful to provide Content-Type to distinguish between
> > different
> > encodings of message (for example JSON).
>
> Yep. Will add this.
I'm using application/x-protobuf here as protobuf-net does.
> I will. So this makes 3 very similar http based protocols, but slightly
> different. We should come to an agreement. :-)
Definitely we have :) But it seem impossible :)
Pavel
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To post to this group, send email to proto...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
