On 27 April 2015 at 13:14, Rafael Schloming <r...@alum.mit.edu> wrote: > This one should definitely go in: >
Ok, I'll pick it in. > + aa5ea2b62fd5680bc2a36bee14f72e037d8cc276 close the transport when the > selector reports an error > > I also added PROTON-858 as a release blocker. > > --Rafael > > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Gordon Sim <g...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> On 04/27/2015 12:46 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote: >> >>> I have gone through the git cherry output and categorised the >>> remaining commits from master that dont have a direct equivalent on >>> the 0.9.x branch, splitting according to what they update i.e. mainly >>> by language. I listed some as excluded based on what they are for, e.g >>> the 0.10 sasl work, and any Go-only changes (because the Go bits were >>> not in 0.9). >>> >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~robbie/qpid/proton/0.9.1/git-cherry-pass1-categorised.txt >>> >>> I'd like to get the 0.9.1 release out this week, which would mean >>> starting a vote tomorrow, so if you want specific commits included >>> then please shout now. >>> >> >> I think all the commits under 'Python (+Examples)' can be included for >> 0.9.1. >> >>
