On 6/29/20 6:22 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > and describes the > old text as a "relic", which is another way of saying that the > problems were only there by historical accident, rather than by anyone > intentionally keeping it there.
I would say that say that I have seen the term "relic" being used as a 'weaponized' word to imply that the old thing WAS there intentionally as a repressive measure. I am not saying that this usage was intended to be used that way, but just as the old wording was taken as offensive to some due to implication, I can see that message as offensive to others due to implication, all because some people are easy to offend. -- Richard Damon _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/6EN5RNF5CFDKCF3ZYQV53XH5KTBCSAQ6/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
