Oh, perhaps not as abstact methods but with an empty default implementation, so that you can but mustn't implement them (according to your needs).
Michael Michael Hunger schrieb: > Sounds good: +1 > > Michael > Niclas Hedhman schrieb: >> On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 5:58 PM, Alin Dreghiciu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Looking at GenericSideEffect I do not see the added value of having >>> this class beside the small benefit of the fact that by inheriting it >>> you get the extends of SideEffectOd and implements InvocationHandler. >>> Can it be that is there for a future use where we could add something >>> to it and so all the subclasses will inherit it? >> I think we should redo it so that there are protected methods; >> >> protected abstract void beforeInvoke( Method method, Object[] args); >> >> protected abstract void onSuccess( Object returnValue ); >> >> protected abstract void onException( Throwable exception ); >> >> >> or something like that and make the invoke() final, as suggested. >> >> >> Cheers >> Niclas >> >> _______________________________________________ >> qi4j-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev > > _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
