Wolfgang wrote: >QPC presumes (and rightly so) that you have a running >and functioning Windows machine. Exactly. That is IMHO one of the reasons why a Windows PC is not a QL system. On a QL/Q40 I don't have to fight with Windows problems to keep my QL/Q40 from crashing. >I don't know about other, all I can say is that I don't. I use the PC >for things I can't do on the QL. For anything I can use the QL, I do. That's very good. But I don't think you are representative for all the former QL users who migrated to Windows. They may only use the emulator as a toy or no longer at all. You won't find most of them on this list, because they lost every interest in the QL. >> I think it is native hardware that keeps a system alive. A system that >> mostly depends on emulation is dead. >> >No.
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Peter Graf
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Bill Waugh
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Phoebus Dokos
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Bill Waugh
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Wolfgang Lenerz
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Peter Graf
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Wolfgang Lenerz
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Marcel Kilgus
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Peter Graf
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Peter Graf
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Peter Graf
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Bill Waugh
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Bill Waugh
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Tony Firshman
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Tony Firshman
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Peter Graf
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Wolfgang Lenerz
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Phoebus Dokos
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Peter Graf
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Dilwyn Jones
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Urs König