At 06:49 �� 18/2/2002 +0100, you wrote: >Phoebus R. Dokos wrote: > > > Well, just think of QXL user ! at most 8 Megs. > > You are right of course. In any case hidden refresh a-la PEX/PICE would > > solve most problems > >Solve the problem of memory consumption? How? > > > (at least for the thing I wanna do... -sprites-) > >Well, where exactly is your problem? I don't see any relation to >memory constraints or PEX.
Oh you misunderstood me... What I meant is that you won't have to move the ENTIRE screen memory, only a part at a time. And that would be the area of the sprites :-) (Which is by default smaller due to their size) Phoebus
