OK - DST timezone confusion.... What I meant to say was
14:00 UK 15:00 CET 10:00 EDT (9:00 EDT for following weeks) Apologies -- Rob On 27/03/2008, Robert Godfrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK - presuming I've not forgotten any public holidays this week, we > should have our first call this Friday at 15:00UK (16:00 CET, 09:00 > EDT). > > Anybody wishing to attend, let me know and I'll forward them dial-in details > > And a reminder that we'll post anything we discuss to the list > afterwards (first point of action will be to nominate this week's > minute taker :-) ) > > Speak to you tomorrow I hope, > -- Rob > > > On 19/03/2008, Robert Godfrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > How would people feel about having a Java call this Friday at 15:00 > > GMT to go over where we think we are with M2.1 and M3; and to discuss > > this weeks commits? > > > > I've created a number of shared JIRA filters (shared for everyone in > > the qpid-developers group) which should help us here. > > > > Qpid : new issues in last 10 days > > Qpid : Unscoped Open JIRAs > > Qpid : M2.1 Scoped Jiras > > Qpid : M3 Scoped Jiras > > > > For completeness I also created > > > > Qpid : Unscoped Closed JIRAs > > > > Which contains 251 issues which we have marked as resolved but forgot > > (!) to mark the fixed-in version. > > > > If this time is OK for everyone who wishes to participate let me know. > > I'll mail people a meeting number and local dial code once we have > > agreement on a time. > > > > -- Rob > > > > > > > > On 18/03/2008, Robert Godfrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm open as to whether we have separate calls for the separate > languages - in practice those working on the same language need much closer > co-ordination than those on separate languages. And the amount of cross > language scheduling is such that it is probably easy enough to do via > e-mail... > > > > > > I shall have a look at my conference line provider to see if it has a > recording facility. (From an access point of view my line has local numbers > in most countries)... > > > > > > -- Rob > > > > > > > > > > > > On 18/03/2008, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What about using something like gotomeeting.com with a conf call > that > > > > > can all be recorded and linked via a web page? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > never used it -- does it work well? > > > > > > > > Also, do we want to have calls for separate sections of the project. > I > > > > think Rob mentioned that? > > > > > > > > Carl. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
