Gah - good point Rajith...

Sorry - I have to work those days and completely forgot!

next week it is then!

Since most of the java guys work in Europe I suggest we follow
European timezone comnventions (i.e. the meeting will be at 9am
Eastern right now, but once Europe switches to DST it'll be 10am
Eastern).

-- Rob

On 19/03/2008, Rajith Attapattu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert,
>
>  Firdays at 9 EST is good.
>  However this friday is a holiday (Good friday).
>  So perhaps we can start from next week.
>
>  Regards,
>
>  Rajith
>
>  On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Robert Godfrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
>
>  > How would people feel about having a Java call this Friday at 15:00
>  > GMT to go over where we think we are with M2.1 and M3; and to discuss
>  > this weeks commits?
>  >
>  > I've created a number of shared JIRA filters (shared for everyone in
>  > the qpid-developers group) which should help us here.
>  >
>  > Qpid : new issues in last 10 days
>  > Qpid : Unscoped Open JIRAs
>  > Qpid : M2.1 Scoped Jiras
>  > Qpid : M3 Scoped Jiras
>  >
>  > For completeness I also created
>  >
>  > Qpid : Unscoped Closed JIRAs
>  >
>  > Which contains 251 issues which we have marked as resolved but forgot
>  > (!) to mark the fixed-in version.
>  >
>  > If this time is OK for everyone who wishes to participate let me know.
>  >  I'll mail people a meeting number and local dial code once we have
>  > agreement on a time.
>  >
>  > -- Rob
>  >
>  >
>  > On 18/03/2008, Robert Godfrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > > I'm open as to whether we have separate calls for the separate languages
>  > - in practice those working on the same language need much closer
>  > co-ordination than those on separate languages.  And the amount of cross
>  > language scheduling is such that it is probably easy enough to do via
>  > e-mail...
>  > >
>  > > I shall have a look at my conference line provider to see if it has a
>  > recording facility.  (From an access point of view my line has local 
> numbers
>  > in most countries)...
>  > >
>  > > -- Rob
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > On 18/03/2008, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > > >
>  > > >  >
>  > > >  > What about using something like gotomeeting.com with a conf call
>  > that
>  > > >  > can all be recorded and linked via a web page?
>  > > >  >
>  > > >  >
>  > > >  >
>  > > >  >
>  > > >
>  > > >
>  > > > never used it -- does it work well?
>  > > >
>  > > >  Also, do we want to have calls for separate sections of the project.
>  > I
>  > > >  think Rob mentioned that?
>  > > >
>  > > > Carl.
>  > > >
>  > > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  >
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Regards,
>
>  Rajith Attapattu
>  Red Hat
>  blog: http://rajith.2rlabs.com/
>

Reply via email to