Thanks all for the vote of confidence :).  Irrelevant of any decision I'm
going to keep doing what I'm doing.

I believe Paul's motivation(and feel free to correct me Paul) in discussing
this question is that he want's us to work together as a community to come
to decisions about how we would like to proceed.  I agree with that
sentiment and plan to work towards that goal.

donald

On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Vincent JARDIN <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I agree, see below
>
> Le 7 nov. 2015 05:55, "Jafar Al-Gharaibeh" <[email protected]> a écrit :
> >
> >
> > On 11/6/2015 5:44 PM, Martin Winter wrote:
> >>
> >> To push this even further, is there a reason why you (Daniel) or your
> colleague
> >> Donald or a person like Timos don’t want to be a maintainer? Or just
> nobody
> >> ever asked or considered it?
> >
> >
> > Thank you Martin for pushing this. I think this is very important for
> the project over the long term.
> >  I haven't looked at the maintainers list, but I always assumed Donald
> is on the list. It is news to me he isn't!
> > He has been very active and did many great things. I vote him in - if
> there is a voice for the community :)
>
> Me too. I agree there is a need to have a good momentum, Donald
> demonstrated lot of capabilities. I agree with Paul that we need to improve
> but I feel we should continue with steps.
>
> Since Septembre, there is a good momentum thanks to Paul + Martin + people
> on the list.
> I feel Donald will be able to help to sustain it.
> Then, later it will grow (more CI, improved reviewd/ack't process, etc.),
> but we should not wait for the graal before doing another baby step.
>
> So I am supportive on Donald getting a write access to the git trie as
> long as Donald keeps following 1 rule: do not push its own code if not
> reviewed/ack't first, even if it takes time. I saw on the list that Donald
> is a good citizen, so I am confident it won't happen.
>
> Best regards,
>   Vincent
>
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Jafar
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Quagga-dev mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> Quagga-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
>
_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev

Reply via email to