[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 18:03 +0200, Arik Jones wrote: >> There really is no reason to be a prude about it though. It's open >> source and we should expect no less. I say instead of complaining, >> re-factor the code and release it. That'd seem easier than trying to >> micro-manage each pull request. > > > Easy gents, we're all on the same side here. There is no reason why > Marty shouldn't be able to manage the extension he built. There's also > no reason to hate on Tim for forking it. That's the great thing about > open source, we build on the successes of others. > > I'll probably be using Tim's version of the extension (no offense Marty) > because it has some added functionality that I need. When Marty finds > the time to modify the original extension (time is always in short > supply) I'll probably switch back to his version. I didn't mean to stir > up any ill will that may, or may not, exist between Marty or Tim. Both > of you guys rock. > > > ~Nate
I'm not saying to not manage your extension's development. But in Git the culture of open source collaboration is mildly different. But then again, I see your point. I can't wait to see what page_event becomes though. Could easily be a core extension once it reaches maturity! -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. _______________________________________________ Radiant mailing list Post: [email protected] Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant
