On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 11:55 PM, Nate <pixeln...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Jim Gay wrote:
>>
>> Hmm. If it's going to go that way, I retract the suggestion. Why not
>> just add an attribute to if_content which checks the presence of text
>> then. <if_content part="my_part" blank="false|true">
>> And then inheritance would get tricky.
>>
>>
>
> That does sound like a better way to do it. Honestly, I am not entirely
> certain how you would have used if_part outside of the if_content tag. I am
> curious how that would be more useful tha <r:if_content part="xxxx" />?

I've had users confused by the tag. They would have an empty page part
and wonder why something doesn't work expecting that if_content
actually checked if there was content (text), not that it checked if
there was a page part.

>>
>> +1 for if_url and if_path changes
>>
>
> Ditto.
>
>
> ~N
_______________________________________________
Radiant mailing list
Post:   Radiant@radiantcms.org
Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/
Site:   http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant

Reply via email to