On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 11:55 PM, Nate <pixeln...@gmail.com> wrote: > Jim Gay wrote: >> >> Hmm. If it's going to go that way, I retract the suggestion. Why not >> just add an attribute to if_content which checks the presence of text >> then. <if_content part="my_part" blank="false|true"> >> And then inheritance would get tricky. >> >> > > That does sound like a better way to do it. Honestly, I am not entirely > certain how you would have used if_part outside of the if_content tag. I am > curious how that would be more useful tha <r:if_content part="xxxx" />?
I've had users confused by the tag. They would have an empty page part and wonder why something doesn't work expecting that if_content actually checked if there was content (text), not that it checked if there was a page part. >> >> +1 for if_url and if_path changes >> > > Ditto. > > > ~N _______________________________________________ Radiant mailing list Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant