At one point, I believe it was for Con-way, I implemented an
<r:if_blank> tag that checked whether a part was blank. Regarding the
syntax of Jim's proposal, it would be nice to disambiguate the 'blank'
attribute - it's unclear to me what it would do in each case. Maybe:
<r:if_content part="my_part" allow_blank="true|false">
Sean
Nate wrote:
Jim Gay wrote:
Hmm. If it's going to go that way, I retract the suggestion. Why not
just add an attribute to if_content which checks the presence of text
then. <if_content part="my_part" blank="false|true">
And then inheritance would get tricky.
That does sound like a better way to do it. Honestly, I am not
entirely certain how you would have used if_part outside of the
if_content tag. I am curious how that would be more useful tha
<r:if_content part="xxxx" />?
+1 for if_url and if_path changes
Ditto.
~N
_______________________________________________
Radiant mailing list
Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org
Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/
Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant
_______________________________________________
Radiant mailing list
Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org
Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/
Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant
