I don't freelance. I did though, in an economy that's constantly in
bad shape. And price played a *much* bigger part than I see it
happening here. Hence the idea that given enough shit hits the fan,
globally/financially speaking, I think this phenomena could become
increasingly common.

Not meaning to sound negative though. I'm well aware there's a lot
more that comes into play. The reason why I'm sharing my view is I
always found myself giving this matter some thought from time to time,
and as lots here do freelance, I'm interested in hearing their takes.



On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Steve Hayes <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> So far no one has mentioned the competition and what they change (not
> the el cheapo folk).
>
> Are you better than Craig? Do you charge more or less?
>
> Steve
>
> On 16/03/2009, at 4:42 PM, Julio Cesar Ody wrote:
>
>>
>> I tend to agree. But the definition of good and what's worth more is
>> directly proportional to your client's ability to perceive things the
>> way you do (adjustable through marketing), and how much money he has
>> in his pocket (not adjustable).
>>
>> Think of this scenario: there's you, for  $50/hour, making slick
>> stuff, well balanced, scalable, etc. Then there's el cheapo's websites
>> for $10/hour. So your task now becomes: explain why you're worth 5x
>> more. Now between us here, I know damn well why you're worth it, but
>> your customer may not share our view of better. Or at least not enough
>> to justify the increase. Then you'll find yourself haggling.
>>
>> In a good economy such as what we have here in AU, that's not so
>> easily perceived . Put it simply, people/companies have more money in
>> their pockets, and they're mostly willing to afford what's better.
>> Change that, thanks to a recession, and your demographic suddenly
>> becomes a lot smaller, competition ensues, and voila: rates will have
>> to go down.
>>
>> That's my theory. I'm happy to hear counterarguments.
>>
>> ps: the human game of haggling is what usually puts me off of
>> freelancing.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Mike Bailey <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>> Money is only one component of price.
>>>
>>> I see pricing a job as a game of snakes and ladders. Here are some
>>> of the
>>> things I take into account when setting a price for a job. My
>>> clients have
>>> always been keen to include as many "ladders" as possible in order
>>> to get
>>> the best rate.
>>>
>>> # Ladders
>>> * Quick payment
>>> * Flexibile hours and ability to work remotely
>>> * Working with smart people
>>> * Ability to release work as Open Source
>>> * Working on things I want to learn about
>>> * Work I see as worthwhile
>>>
>>> # Snakes
>>> * Long payment terms
>>> * Distracting work environment
>>> * Frustrating beaurocracy
>>>
>>> The most enjoyable project I worked on recently was for a Not For
>>> Profit
>>> after the bushfires. It was all ladders and I set my rate at $0.
>>> Unfortunately I'm not in a position to do all my work at this
>>> rate! :-)
>>>
>>> - Mike
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Craig Ambrose <[email protected]
>>> >
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>
>>>> I'm not sure if anyone else is feeling like business is a little
>>>> different to what it was a couple of years ago. I'm a bit concerned
>>>> about it, and I've decided to drop my rates fairly dramatically. I'd
>>>> be interested to hear what others are doing. More on my thoughts
>>>> here:
>>>>
>>>> http://blog.craigambrose.com/past/2009/3/16/keeping_it_real/
>>>>
>>>> cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Craig
>>>>
>>>> -------
>>>> Craig Ambrose
>>>> Cogent Consulting
>>>> http://www.craigambrose.com
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> >
>
> Steve
>
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
or Rails Oceania" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rails-oceania?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to