Rob,

Your post is a good summary of why many people consider the recruitment
model you describe as being 'broken'.

The on-costs you point out can be avoided in many cases... lots of small
businesses are exempt from payroll tax (Current threshold in NSW is
$689,000)
And many industry segments for larger corporates (media for one) often does
not require PI and PL for Developers.

Recruitment agencies tend to charge the insurance anyway as they have a
discounted policy for n Developers and it becomes another place to hide the
cream (and seems like a value add with a bit of sales talk).

Your argument about low paying jobs is a bit ironic... if the offered rate
was ~30% higher due to the absence of a recruitment agent... the job might
be worth taking.

Regards,
Andrew Stone.


On 30 July 2012 16:11, Rob <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I am a recruiter, and have had success with this board in placing
> candidates in the market. I totally agree with what Ashley is saying in
> relation to fee structures etc. I would like to elaborate upon the concept
> of Margin, which may equate to a higher than 20% markup. I have no doubt
> that everyone understands this, but just to be sure, as an example...margin
> is the percentage of the charge rate, and markup is the percentage on the
> cost...two totally different things....especially when oncosts are involved.
>
> For instance, if I was to charge a 15% margin on a candidate, who was
> earning $100 per hour, I would have to charge the client $129...this
> ensures that I am earning 15% margin.
>
> To the candidate, I am effectively putting on a 29% markup...BUT only
> earning 15% margin (of the charge rate)
>
> This is where the confusion lies the difference between MARGIN and MARKUP
>
>
> ie. for $129 charge, 15% margin ($19), 10% oncost (workers comp, PI/PL,
> Payroll Tax), and $100 for the candidate
>
> $100 + $10 + $19 = $129...the recruiter is earning 15% margin of the
> charge rate.
>
> If we reverse it from a charge of $100 at a margin of 15%....I would earn
> $15, oncost $7, candidate rate $77....this is a margin of 15% of the charge
> rate....but if you compare the $77 to the $100 charge, it is roughly a
> 29-30% markup again.
>
>
> So, if people are seeing 30% markups on their rates, please don't assume
> that the recruiter is earning all of that....they aren't. On top of the
> services of payrolling, recruiters take the risk of clients folding or not
> paying, when we always pay our recruiters upon signed timesheets,
> regardless if the client has paid or not....this of course saves the
> candidate from having to chase payment (one more worry they don't have to
> deal with). AND YES, sometimes clients do fold or don't pay.....which means
> as a recruiter, you are out of pocket for the total candidate rate +
> oncosts and of course with the margin that you have lost as well. Once had
> a client not pay for a candidate for two months, they folded, ...so lost
> whole lot of money. Some candidates may laugh and say, well them's the
> breaks....and well, I would have to agree....but we do charge a fee for a
> service and the risk associated where there is essentially no risk to the
> candidate in terms of non-payment (with me anyway)
>
> Also, 15% or there abouts, in the scheme of things, with the amount of
> payroll at risk, is not overly expensive (we currently have a yearly
> payroll of about $1.5million per year give or take - money we pay out and
> hope to get back - this is small for the market).....I have recruited for
> some of the big4 and some of their charge-outs for their permanent
> employees are amazing...we are talking 100-200% sometimes.
>
> So, if you are on a contract through a recruiter, and you are getting paid
> on time for the work you are doing and the pay is correct (no hassles or
> problems each week)...then this is a good thing and is part of the service
> for that 15% margin that they earn.
>
> I firmly agree with Ashley that rule of thumb contract is roughly 20-30%
> increase on a permanent salary...so if you are on $100 per hour, divide
> that by 1.25 and you will get your equivalent permanent comparative rate
> which can easily translate into a permanent salary package...roughly $115k
>
> EVERYONE, regardless of industry or skill needs to separate job worth from
> personal worth. ie, if a CEO hit rock bottom and could only get a job as a
> cleaner, he would only be paid a cleaners salary, even though he is worth a
> CEO salary.
>
> So, if you are getting hit up for low paying roles, that is what the job
> is worth to the employer, if you feel that it is too low, then don't go for
> it (sometimes employers try their luck)....as recruiters we need to keep in
> constant contact with candidates as their situations change and sometimes I
> have had candidates go for lower rate jobs (rare, but it does happen). If
> you are the best Ruby developer in the world, and you are worth $1000 per
> hour but only $50 per hour roles are available, then you have to make a
> judgement call based upon job worth to personal worth....ie you can say "Im
> worth $1000 per hour and not doing that" and don't work and get zero
> income, or you could have income by working at $50 per hour....extreme
> example I know, but hopefully highlights the point I am trying to make.
>
> Yes, there are cowboys in the industry, as with any industry, but like
> Ashley said, there are some good recruiters out there that know their
> markets well, and network hard to find out who, what, when, where, why and
> how........, without finding that information out, they can't provide
> candidates jobs nor can they provide clients candidates....hence the need
> to call people...many many many many people :)
>
>
> On Friday, July 13, 2012 4:02:19 PM UTC+10, Ashley P wrote:
>>
>> Chances are they might be :)
>>
>> But we aren't all bad!
>>
>> If you are a Ruby developer chances are you've probably seen my name
>> before either on Seek, at Ruby meet-ups or on one of those pesky
>> Linked-in invites I send around. I really like the Ruby community and have
>> a passion for working with developers to find them cool jobs.
>>
>> That being said recruitment gets a bad name especially amongst the Ruby
>> community. I'm here to defend our reputation but also to acknowledge our
>> flaws.
>>
>> Many recruiters do have no idea when it comes to development roles. They
>> throw out buzz words like 'Apache' or 'Object Oriented' to make it look
>> like they know what they are talking about.
>>
>> That being said a recruiter can often be of use. They can present
>> opportunities that you wouldn't have heard about, discuss potential career
>> movements or even help with your resume and skills training programs.
>>
>> Sure as a quality developer you could probably find a good job yourself.
>> But are you sure it's the best job!!? Use your own networks in addition to
>> a recruiter to expand the pool of jobs and find yourself in the best job
>> you can!
>> *
>> *
>> *Tips on dealing with recruiters:*
>>
>>    - 1. Don't only use a recruiter. *Use your own networks as well.*Come up 
>> with an many opportunities as you can yourself and then use a
>>    recruiter or 2 to expand your opportunities
>>    - 2. *Don't be pushed around on Salary/Rate*. Know what you're worth.
>>    Be open with your salary with a friend or former colleague to know what
>>    your worth and stick to it. (A common tactic is to ask people what they
>>    were on previously and hold them to a salary near this. You shouldn't fall
>>    for it. Be honest about what you were previously on but let the recruiter 
>> /
>>    hiring manager know that due to your research you believe the market rate
>>    to be X and that you are hoping for a figure around that mark.)
>>    - 3. *Ask who the client is*. Often a recruiter will want to chat to
>>    you a bit first however, it is totally within your right to ask who the
>>    recruiters client is after an initial chat to determine your suitability
>>    - 4. Remember *your in control of the process. *If you don't like a
>>    specific recruiter don't use him/her. In fact it's your right to call up
>>    and say I don't want you representing me to X.
>>
>> *Can a recruiter really help me?*
>>
>>    - Yes and no. It really depends on the relationships the recruiter
>>    has built.
>>    - If the recruiter is blindly sending CV's around town without having
>>    met the hiring manager they really won't be of any use to you.
>>    - That being said if they have built a strong relationship with the
>>    hiring manager their word often will decide whether or not you get an
>>    interview :). They can also act as a beneficial middle ground to assist in
>>    negotiations and getting things moving!
>>
>>
>> *Recruitment Rates*
>>
>>    - Are recruitment rates too high? Well honestly yes they are fairly
>>    high but we are running a business and as you can all understand we need 
>> to
>>    make a profit!
>>    - Also people don't realise the amount of effort we actually go to in
>>    providing a short-list. Many developers think I just simply called them,
>>    sent their resume to the company and got a massive cheque. What they don't
>>    realise is that to get that one person a job I had to look at over 400
>>    resumes, speak to over 80 people and all for a 1/3 shot in actually 
>> filling
>>    a position. I work 8-6 and I'm a fairly quick worker!
>>    - That being said yes some recruitment rates are too high and
>>    companies need to be smart on who they use.
>>
>> Anyway if your looking for a recruiter who loves the Ruby community and
>> who actually cares about your career please give me a call. I won't screw
>> you over and I'm available after-hours with bookings and all conversations
>> are 100% confidential.
>>
>> [email protected]. 0404-590-975.
>>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Ruby or Rails Oceania" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rails-oceania/-/0Q_9sWmaCaQJ.
>
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/rails-oceania?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
or Rails Oceania" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rails-oceania?hl=en.

Reply via email to