Why don't you revoke the messages as spam and let TES do it's trick.  My
understanding is that if you revoke a message, then the Trust value of
the poster is diminished.  Also, razor isn't there a switch to ignore
lists?

-----Original Message-----
From: Justin Mason [mailto:jm@;jmason.org] 
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 1:11 PM
To: John J. Stimson-III
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Razor-users] False positives / opt-in lists on Razor 



> I suspect that there are some folks who are funneling non-verified or 
> low-threshold SpamAssassin output into razor-report.  If you're using 
> SpamAssassin, please raise your threshold for reporting to Razor to at
> *least* 15 points (I still get false positives even in my 15-point 
> box), or verify the messages yourself before reporting them, or just 
> don't auto-report.  All you are doing by reporting unverified spam is 
> making more work for others and eroding your own confidence rating.

Just don't auto-report, full stop.  That feature's been gone from
SpamAssassin for a while, and for a good reason.

I would think, BTW, that it's more likely someone has accidentally
redirected a subscribed account into a spamtrap; or that it's an active
attack against Razor.

--j.


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future 
of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community 
Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. 
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0003en
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future
of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community
Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now.
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0003en
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users

Reply via email to