On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, Santiago Vila wrote: > Andreas Schamanek wrote: > > If an official developer thinks that this is a bad idea I will stop it > > immediately. > > Please do so. The current FAQ was presumably written by an official > developer and it says: > > Q: I have an Header Analysis/Keyword Based/AI/Categorization application > that detects spam. Can I automatically report spam detected by my > application? > > No. Only spam detected by humans should be reported to Razor. Automata, > however good it is at detecting spam, isn't human, and should not be > allowed to make a report or revoke decision. The only exception to this > rule is troll addresses that have been seeded for the purpose of > gathering spam.
Thanks. I have just re-checked the FAQ myself (BTW, to be found at http://razor.sourceforge.net/docs/faq.html , last updated 2002-10-14). If it were just that easy. In my own case, I am running an 'Automata' of which troll addresses are a major part and moreover, this 'Automata' is reviewed by humans. So, what is the official opinion in this case? > Even if razor v2 has a trust system, it's better for your trust and > the overall trust of the system as a whole if people do not > autoreport. ACK. But if there is a trust system then this system will deal with it anyway, no matter what I do. That's my point! That's exactly what I think is the right way to go and Razor does it/will do it. -- -- Andreas ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0003en _______________________________________________ Razor-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
