On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Matt Kettler wrote: > Are you autoreporting from a spamtrap, or autoreporting based on > SpamAssassin score? Your message does not mention SA, something mine > did mention, and there's a significant difference.
We were all talking of SpamAssassin. So were I. > Autoreporting based on SpamAssassin score is something both the > Razor and SpamAssassin developers seem to think is a bad idea. Can you give us pointers? > As for blatantly ignorant, I only consider it blatantly ignorant if > you've been told that both the Razor and SpamAssassin development > teams feel it's a bad idea and continue to insist it must be a good > one. I have been asking this list here whether to auto-report or not to auto-report. And I was told to not report to Razor1 but to report to Razor2. That's what I am doing. And, I am reviewing the whole process. Falsely reported messages get revoked. If an official developer thinks that this is a bad idea I will stop it immediately. Nevertheless, as I have said before, he programme itself has to take care of people and programmes that falsely report messages, auto-revoke messages and so on. > After all, if you're using SA, what's the benefit to you of > reporting the mails to razor? if SA hit it the first time, it's > going to hit it the second time, etc. NACK. This only applies in a trivial case. This does not apply if you use self written SA tests, AWL, custom blacklists and more. (I am moreover using a filter system before SA gets called.) -- -- Andreas ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0003en _______________________________________________ Razor-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
