Autoreporting in general is NOT a bad thing.
Autoreporting based on SpamAssassin score is something both the Razor and SpamAssassin developers seem to think is a bad idea. As for blatantly ignorant, I only consider it blatantly ignorant if you've been told that both the Razor and SpamAssassin development teams feel it's a bad idea and continue to insist it must be a good one. (ie: the "I know what's better for Razor than the people that wrote it" argument).
After all, if you're using SA, what's the benefit to you of reporting the mails to razor? if SA hit it the first time, it's going to hit it the second time, etc. The only reason to report a SA tagged email to razor is if you're sure it's spam, that way the users of razor who don't use SA will match it.
At 10:54 PM 10/24/2002 +0200, Andreas Schamanek wrote:
Get out your flame throwers! Here is one of these "blatantly ignorant users": I *am* auto-reporting. And guess what: If Razor (and the other similar services) would not let me do it I would write my own checksum filter.
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0003en
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
