Get out your flame throwers! Here is one of these "blatantly ignorant users": I *am* auto-reporting. And guess what: If Razor (and the other similar services) would not let me do it I would write my own checksum filter.
A message that came in and that for what ever reason was not tested against Razor (in my case I cannot check every message against Razor because this would put too much load on the server) but which is most likely UCE or UBE should, IMO, be reported. To me it sounds like some people have not fully understood how Razor works and why it actually (even version 1) works. One major reason why there are not many false positives is that a message which arrives at my mailbox and which is falsely reported to Razor is unlikely to arrive in someone else's mailbox. Contrary, if it is spam it is likely to arrive at many mailboxes and should be filtered. In case of mailing lists and such this concept does not work well. But that's where Razor2 comes in, doesn't it? Anyway, Matt and Jeffrey and fellows, you won't be able to stop people from reporting non-spam messages (just by shouting out STOP!). You will have to find a way to deal with real stupid users and with people like me. Change the program, change your own thresholds or whatever. BTW, I am auto-reporting and I am revoking falsely reported messages. YMMV, -- -- Andreas ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0003en _______________________________________________ Razor-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
