Of course, some blatantly ignorant users of SA have decided to create procmail recipes to autoreport based on the SA output anyway. It's highly misguided, but some people insist it's a good idea and helpful despite being told otherwise. I'm not quite sure how Vipul stands on it, but I dug back in the archives and a lot of the razor development types and heavy users seem to agree it's a Bad Idea, as do most of the SA devs.
Fortunately if their SA config is reporting false positives the submitter confidence rating system of Razor2 should eventually cause them to be ignored.
At 10:21 AM 10/24/2002 -0700, John J. Stimson-III wrote:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 06:11:16PM +0100, Justin Mason wrote: > Just don't auto-report, full stop. That feature's been gone from > SpamAssassin for a while, and for a good reason.I only installed SpamAssassin recently, and didn't know that it had ever had the facility to auto-report. However, using procmail it's trivially easy to have the marked mail piped to a reporting program instead of a mailbox or /dev/null.
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0003en
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
