At Fri Oct 25 00:15:30 2002, Andreas Schamanek wrote: > > > > No. Only spam detected by humans should be reported to Razor. Automata, > > however good it is at detecting spam, isn't human, and should not be > > allowed to make a report or revoke decision. The only exception to this > > rule is troll addresses that have been seeded for the purpose of > > gathering spam. > > If it were just that easy. In my own case, I am running an 'Automata' > of which troll addresses are a major part and moreover, this > 'Automata' is reviewed by humans. So, what is the official opinion in > this case?
As far as I can see, your automaton is auto-reporting. The human interaction comes later, *after* other users have made use of the report. While it may be correct to revoke an erroneous report, the fact is that for many the damage has already been done. FWIW, I use Razor via its integration with SpamAssassin. I'm not a developer of either (though I have suggested rules for SA). Martin -- Martin Radford | "Only wimps use tape backup: _real_ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | men just upload their important stuff -o) Registered Linux user #9257 | on ftp and let the rest of the world /\\ - see http://counter.li.org | mirror it ;)" - Linus Torvalds _\_V ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0004en _______________________________________________ Razor-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
