Thanks for making that point. EFF's newsletter has 30,000 subscribers. It is one of the oldest web sites and lists on the internet. It was started before spam was even invented. For some time I was running Mailman and it cleaned out about 10,000 dead email addresses. We now are using a different system through our action center and I'm investigating it's vulnerabilities.

But - the point is like you said. I wonder if anyone who has a list of this size - especially a list that would be the target of those who disagree with our views - could ever put out a newsletter without somebody somewhere flagging it as spam. And - there's nothing that the owners of these lists can do to prevent Razor from censoring lists of this nature without Razor changing it's trust system to something that's smarter that what it currently is.

Bob Proulx wrote:

I agree those were plausible reasons why a newletter would be listed
in razor.  But then wouldn't it follow that any sufficiently large
newletter would *always* be listed in razor?  The larger the
distribution list then the better the odds are that someone receiving
the newsletter will be a) clueless b) dead or c) other and the message
would get reported.  This will be a continous, ongoing, never ending
problem.  Wouldn't it?

Bob


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users





------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Razor-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users

Reply via email to