On Aug 25, 2006, at 1:13 PM, John Kubie wrote:
These are the "users" that REALsoftware chooses to emphasize
("users" is their word). On the REALsoftware homepage, when you
click on any of these terms there is a nice description of why
REALbasic fits the bill.
I'm not arguing that "science" should be on their homepage. What I
and others feel is that REALbasic is a hard sell to our colleagues
when there is little evidence that anybody in science uses it. In
fact, many of us do, and consider it a good solution. But I'd like
to be able to point to a community of scientific users to bolster
my arguments.
John Kubie
A new entry in that list is quite different from "focusing" on science.
It's a description of why RB is useful in that field.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
