I think you're missing the point. REALsoftware, like any commercial
interest, should try to serve their primary customers. If there are 3
or 300 or 3000 scientific users a real issue. For example, if you go
to Apple's website, and click on "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" you will see four groups:
"science", "small business", "creative pro" and "education". These
are, I presume, the groups that Apple feels can use their products.
Furthermore, these are are not passive, casually identified groups.
Apple actively courts each of these, tries to identify their needs,
and, when possible, serve them. Apple actively forms links to each
community.
Should REALsoftware do this for science? That is their decision. But
it is not simply a question of whether REALbasic fits the needs of
scientists. If REALbasic and science are a good potential fit, this
is a connection that should be clarified and strengthened.
John Kubie
On Aug 25, 2006, at 3:32 PM, Norman Palardy wrote:
A new entry in that list is quite different from "focusing" on
science.
It's a description of why RB is useful in that field.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
