Le 24 janv. 07 à 21:55 Soir, Norman Palardy a écrit:
On Jan 24, 2007, at 1:36 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I'd recommend using a newer version of
RB anyway -- so many improvements have been made, I don't know how
people can stand using the older stuff. :)
Granted there are a lot of things I'd like o use in new versions
but the whole memory usgae issue in 2006 and 2007 makes them
largely unproductive
RB 2005 has an issue trying to get access to items in /tmp using a
Shell Path which limits how you can use it with some other programs
that put files there
And 5.5.5 still launches tons faster and compiles way faster than
any 200x version and I can leave it running for days.
I can't do that with 2006 or 2007. I have to restart them regularly
as do others (read the "Insane memory consumption of the IDE" thread)
Just because you have no issues with new versions doesn't mean
others don't
That's right. I feel like the new versions (starting at 2005) are
another product.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
