Actually, this addresses the actual game:

http://www.advancednflstats.com/2009/11/belichicks-4th-down-decision-vs-colts.html

On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Steve Ouellette <[email protected]>wrote:

> I bet this guy would agree with me and Ray.
>
> http://www.advancednflstats.com/2009/09/4th-down-study-part-1.html
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Steve Gendron <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>  I agree with all the commentary about why the Pats never should have
>> been in that position to begin with (poor time management, sketchy play
>> calling, questionable penalty calls, etc.).  However, I think Belichek's
>> call was just ridiculous.  Steve correctly points out that Manning had moved
>> the team down the field on the previous drive (even that Pass Interference
>> aided drive took 1:49), however the defense had stopped the Colts several
>> times prior to that.  They forced them to punt 8 times in the game (I think
>> that was a record) and had 2 INTs.  It is much tougher to score in 2 minutes
>> from your own 30 than your opponents 30 - I don't think that is up for
>> debate.  You have simply GOT to give your defense a chance to keep the Colts
>> from gaining ~70 yards on a drive in the final two minutes with one timeout
>> (I stand corrected) left.  It was just a bad call, and in an honest moment I
>> think even BB would admit it.
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Steve Ouellette
>> *Sent:* Monday, November 16, 2009 1:17 PM
>>
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* Re: Football Numbers
>>
>> First, they still had one timeout, plus the two minute warning. And
>> second, you must have missed the previous drive where they went through the
>> Patriots like a hot knife through butter (albeit helped by a bogus 30-yard
>> pass interference call) in less than two minutes, using no timeouts.
>>
>> Steve O
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Steve Gendron <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>  OK, Since we're talking about imaginary numbers....
>>>
>>> I think your estimate is a little on the low side, but for the sake of
>>> argument I will give it to you.  I think the Colts have a less than 30%
>>> chance of scoring with no time outs if we kick it away.
>>>
>>> Any other coach in the league would be in danger of being fired today
>>> after that call.
>>>
>>>  ------------------------------
>>>  *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
>>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Ray Salemi
>>> *Sent:* Monday, November 16, 2009 11:08 AM
>>>
>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>> *Subject:* Re: Football Numbers
>>>
>>>  I'm saying that their chances of scoring from the 30 with 2 minutes to
>>> go is 50%
>>>
>>> and the chances of stopping the Pats was 60%.
>>>
>>> So the odds of the Colts winning was 30%.
>>>
>>> I'm OK with that.
>>>
>>> Ray
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Steve Gendron <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>  You guys are really drinking the Belichek Kool-aid.  Are you really
>>>> telling me that the chances of Manning scoring from the Colts 30 with no
>>>> time outs are equal to that of them scoring on the Pats 30 under the same
>>>> conditions?  No matter how you slice it, it was a bad call.  It cost the
>>>> Patriots home field advantage in the playoffs, which can be the difference
>>>> in a Superbowl drive.
>>>>
>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>  *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
>>>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Ray Salemi
>>>> *Sent:* Monday, November 16, 2009 8:45 AM
>>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>>> *Subject:* Re: Football Numbers
>>>>
>>>>  Steve O has cleverly summed up my numbers approach
>>>>
>>>> It seems to make sense that the Patriots had a much better chance of
>>>>> making two yards than they had of stopping the Colts.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I bow to his explanatory powers!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Author of "Leading After a Layoff: Reignite Your Team's Productivity in
>>> Just 12 Weeks"
>>> www.leadingafteralayoff.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> >>
>>
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Red 
Sox Citizens" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to