Why not use the package name with '/' instead of '.', e.g.
org/
apache/
ant/
1.5.1/
avalon/
commons/
httpclient/
2.0/
etc?
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://www.freeroller.net/page/dion/Weblog
Work: http://www.multitask.com.au
Nick Chalko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 06/03/2003 03:33:47 PM:
> http://<host>/<project>/<version>/artifact-[<version>].ext
> Seems to be a reasonable compromise.
>
> For example
>
> http://repo.apache.org/org-apache-ant/1.5.1/ant-1.5.1.jar
> http://repo.apache.org/org-apache-ant/1.5.1/ant-testutil-1.5.1.jar
> http://repo.apache.org/org-apache-ant/1.5.1/LICENSE.txt
>
>
>
> The part still needs to be decided is the project name.
>
> I thing the most stable idea proposed is the java package name with -
> instead of .
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
