Why not use the package name with '/' instead of '.', e.g.

org/
  apache/
    ant/
      1.5.1/
    avalon/
    commons/
      httpclient/
         2.0/

etc?
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog:      http://www.freeroller.net/page/dion/Weblog
Work:      http://www.multitask.com.au


Nick Chalko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 06/03/2003 03:33:47 PM:

> http://<host>/<project>/<version>/artifact-[<version>].ext 
> Seems to be a reasonable compromise.
> 
> For example
> 
> http://repo.apache.org/org-apache-ant/1.5.1/ant-1.5.1.jar
> http://repo.apache.org/org-apache-ant/1.5.1/ant-testutil-1.5.1.jar
> http://repo.apache.org/org-apache-ant/1.5.1/LICENSE.txt
> 
> 
> 
> The part  still needs to be decided is the project name.
> 
> I thing the most stable idea proposed is the java package name with - 
> instead of .
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to