> Why not use the package name with '/' instead of '.', e.g.
>
> org/
>   apache/
>     ant/
>       1.5.1/
>     avalon/
>     commons/
>       httpclient/
>          2.0/
>
> etc?

I'd like that structure - but still would argue that returning a piece of
metadata is propably better - and taking thigns from there.

Dw.

Reply via email to