On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 17:58 -0500, Ian Bicking wrote: > It's only a small piece of Zope 3 or BFG, but a WebOb/Zope API > comparison: http://pythonpaste.org/webob/differences.html#zope-3 > I actually had to complain some to get a published reference doc for > Zope 3 request and response, which is to say that this API isn't > really on the radar of Zope 3 developers. Which I find weird, but I > obviously have my own biases. Zope 3 developers do approach things > from a very different starting point than Pylons/TG/Django (which are > all really pretty close). > > IMHO if you specifically want to "learn Zope 3", then I think you want > to use Grok; there's Zope 3 stuff in BFG, but you probably won't find > yourself actively introduced to it. Though if you are interested in > adding Zope 3 concepts to a WSGI stack, then you'd definitely want > BFG.
Thanks Ian. Mostly I want to broaden my mind with regards to design, especially for projects that might get 'Large'. I really like the formality and clarity of the Component Architecture and it's interface/registry approach, but I will certainly be using it in a wsgi stack of some kind. Guess I'll muck around with all three! Iain _______________________________________________ Repoze-dev mailing list Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev
