2009/5/4 Hanno Schlichting <hanno...@hannosch.eu>: > Our gut feeling told us to either stick with a very-much known beast > like Zope 2.12 or go for repoze.bfg. Grok or the Zope Toolkit didn't > strike us as particular interesting with any of its offerings. I do have > a feeling that we might miss out some of the good features we'd might > give up by going for a very minimal approach. But something that allowed > us to compare our set of technical requirements against the various > options would have been appreciated.
I think of BFG as a microkernel; you can plug into it using WSGI and a few other interfaces. These are simple and so writing libraries for them is easy. Contrast this with Zope where libraries have to be written against an entire framework with a high level of abstraction. Contracts are easier with BFG and it makes development quick and, dare I say it, fun. \malthe _______________________________________________ Repoze-dev mailing list Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev
