> Previously Martin Aspeli wrote: >> You're sure about that? I find it easier to write a new grokker (whether >> for a decorator or a more generic class grokker that looks for a base >> class) than a new ZCML directive (and I've done plenty of both).
Ideally a grokker and a ZCML directive handler would be the same. 2009/5/7 Wichert Akkerman <wich...@wiggy.net>: > Approaching this from another point of view: debugging a grokker that > does not behave as you expect is much harder than debugging a zcml > statement or a python imperative statement. If they were the same, you'd be able to debug a grokker just as you would a ZCML-directive. \malthe _______________________________________________ Repoze-dev mailing list Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev
